Cases 71 - 75 of 75
Martens Cars of Washington, Inc. et al v. Autoliv, Inc. et al
as 5:2012cv12795
Plaintiff:
Martens Cars of Washington, Inc. , Hammett Motor Co., Inc. , Landers Auto Group No. 1, Incorporated and others
Defendant:
Autoliv, Inc., Autoliv ASP, Inc., Autoliv B.V. & Co. KG and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Martens Cars of Washington, Inc et al v. JTEKT Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv12614
Plaintiff:
Martens Cars of Washington, Inc , Landers Auto Group No. 1, Inc. , Hammett Motor Company, Inc and others
Defendant:
JTEKT Corporation, Nachi-Fujikoshi Corp., NSK Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Automotive Parts Antitrust Litigation
as 2:2012md02311
Plaintiff:
A1A Airport & Limousine Service, Inc., AGA Realty LLC, Ifeoma Adams and others
Defendant:
AB SKF, ALPS Electric (North America), Inc., Alps Automotive, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
American Honda Motor Company, Inc., Timmy A. Curtis, Sherman Bearings, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court:
Mitsubishi Motors Credit of America, Inc., Thomas Saris, Jim Sciaroni and others
Petitioner:
Sandra Singer and David Dishman
Respondent:
Hino Motors Manufacturing U.S.A. Inc.
In Re:
Automotive Parts Antitrust Litigation
Special Master:
Gene J. Esshaki
Intervenor:
Financial Recovery Services, LLC and United States of America
Claimant:
Certain End-Payor Settlement Class Members and Enterprise Fleet Management, Inc.
Central Salt, LLC. et al v. Charter Oak Fire Insurance Co., The et al
as 2:2011cv02338
Plaintiff:
Central Salt, LLC. and B.S.C. Holding, Inc.
Defendant:
Charter Oak Fire Insurance Co., The and Travelers Indemnity Company of America, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
AMCO Insurance Company v. Central Salt, LLC.
as 2:2011cv02286
Plaintiff:
AMCO Insurance Company
Defendant:
Central Salt, LLC.
Counter_claimant:
Central Salt, LLC.
Counter_defendant:
AMCO Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
