Cases 1 - 8 of 8
THIRD PARTY SUBPOENAS et al v. GILEAD SCIENCES, INC. et al
as 1:2015mc01769
Plaintiff:
IDENIX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. , UNIVERSITA DEGLI STUDI DI CALIARI, CENTRE NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE and others
Defendant:
GILEAD SCIENCES, INC. and GILEAD PHARMASSET LLC
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash Subpoenas
Idenix Pharmaceuticals LLC et al v. Gilead Pharmasset LLC
as 1:2015cv00416
Plaintiff:
Idenix Pharmaceuticals LLC , Universita Degli Studi di Cagliari , Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique and others
Defendant:
Gilead Pharmasset LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0146
Idenix Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al v. Gilead Pharmasset LLC
as 1:2014cv00109
Plaintiff:
Idenix Pharmaceuticals Inc. , Universita Degli Studi di Cagliari , Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique and others
Defendant:
Gilead Pharmasset LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0146
Idenix Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al v. Gilead Sciences Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01987
Plaintiff:
Idenix Pharmaceuticals Inc. , Universita Degli Studi di Cagliari , Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences Inc. and Gilead Pharmasset LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
CENTRE NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE v. KAPPOS
as 1:2009cv01969
Plaintiff:
CENTRE NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
INSTITUT PASTEUR V SIMON
as 06-1647
Defendant-Appellant:
Adam J. Simon, Ph.D.
Plaintiff-Appellee:
Centre National De La Recherche Scientifique and Institut Pasteur
BRISTOL-MYERS V RHONE-POULENC
as 02-1579
Plaintiff-Appellee:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
Defendant-Appellant:
CENTRE NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE, RHONE-POULENC RORER, INC. and RHONE-POULENC RORER, S.A.
BRISTOL-MYERS V RHONE-POULENC
as 02-1280
Plaintiff-Appellee:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
Defendant-Appellant:
CENTRE NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE, RHONE-POULENC RORER, INC. and RHONE-POULENC RORER, S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
