Cases 31 - 40 of 52
MAJOR v. A.M. LOCKETT & CO., ET AL.
as 2:2008cv77071
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD MAJOR and CHARLES EDWARD MAJOR
Defendant:
A.M. LOCKETT & COMPANY, LTD., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ALLIED EQUIPMENT, INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
THIGPEN et al v. A.M. LOCKETT & CO., ET AL.
as 2:2008cv77178
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD THIGPEN and CHARLES EDWARD THIGPEN
Defendant:
A.M. LOCKETT & COMPANY, LTD., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ALLIED EQUIPMENT, INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
JONAS v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv74885
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD JONAS
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
KENDRICK v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv74928
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD KENDRICK
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HILLS v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv75761
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD HILLS
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SINGLETON v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv68705
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD SINGLETON
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FORD MOTOR COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
GOOD v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv68420
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD GOOD
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FORD MOTOR COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HAMMILL v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv68448
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD HAMMILL
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FORD MOTOR COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
EDWARDS v. 3M
as 2:2008cv68895
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARDS
Defendant:
3M and 3M
Cause Of Action: Diversity
EDWARDS v. 3M
as 2:2008cv68896
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARDS
Defendant:
3M and 3M
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
