Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Deon Duke v. Microsoft Corporation, et al
as 22-2455
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEON LEWIS DUKE, formerly doing business as Serious Tattooing, formerly doing business as Deon LLC, formerly doing business as Option Inc
Defendant / Appellee:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION, ALPHABET INC., META PLATFORMS, INC. and others
Duke v. Microsoft Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00792
Plaintiff:
Deon Lewis Duke formerly doing business as Serious Tattooing formerly doing business as Deon LLC formerly doing business as Option Inc
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation, Alphabet Corporation, Meta Platforms Inc and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rojas v. Charter Communications, Inc.
as 1:2021cv05761
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alejandro Rojas
Defendant:
Charter Communications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Moore v. Charter Communications, Inc.
as 1:2020cv00980
Defendant:
Charter Communications, Inc.
Plaintiff:
George Moore
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Stephen West v. Charter Communications, Inc., et al
as 19-2442
Defendant / Appellee:
INSIGHT KENTUCKY PARTNERS II, L.P., TIME WARNER CABLE and CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN R. WEST
Hazen-Allison v. Charter Communication
as 3:2018cv02132
Defendant:
Charter Communication dba Spectrum Cable, and Charter Communication
Plaintiff:
Crystal Hazen-Allison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Maes, Mitchell v. Charter Communication et al
as 3:2018cv00124
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Maes
Defendant:
Charter Communication and Does 1 - 10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Anderson v. Charter Communications Inc
as 2:2017cv01684
Plaintiff:
Christopher Anderson
Defendant:
Charter Communications Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00750
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
