Cases 1 - 9 of 9
United States of America v. Hidalgo
as 26-1258
Defendant:
ESTEBAN RAMOS-CRUZ, EFRAIN HIDALGO, JUAN TORRES and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Montalvo (Hidalgo)
as 26-1257
Defendant:
MISAEL MONTALVO, CARMEN M. JUSTINIANO RAMIREZ, BRANDON JONAS and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
SEEBARAN CHEKO v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2026cv02543
Plaintiff:
LOURDES GLADYS SEEBARAN CHEKO
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC and PHARMACIA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America v. Montalvo (Jonas)
as 24-1437
Defendant:
BRANDON JONAS, MISAEL MONTALVO, CARMEN M. JUSTINIANO RAMIREZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Montalvo
as 24-671
Defendant:
CARMEN M. JUSTINIANO RAMIREZ, EFRAIN HIDALGO, BRANDON JONAS and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Montalvo
as 20-4176
Defendant:
Carmen M. Justiniano Ramierez, AKA Millie, Efrain Hidalgo, AKA Cheko and Brandon Jonas, AKA B
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Misael Montalvo, AKA Bori, AKA Misa
United States of America v. Hidalgo (Navarro-Gonzalez)
as 16-3721
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Thomas Rodriguez, Esteban Ramos-Cruz, AKA Rudolfo, Jordan Hidalgo and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Alejandro Navarro-Gonzalez, AKA Matatan
United States of America v. Hidalgo (Uda Hidalgo)
as 16-3038
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Thomas Rodriguez, Esteban Ramos-Cruz, AKA Rudolfo, Jordan Hidalgo and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Uda Hidalgo, AKA Urayoan Ground
United States of America v. Hidalgo (Williams)
as 16-2699
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Thomas Rodriguez, Esteban Ramos-Cruz, AKA Rudolfo, Jordan Hidalgo and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Kasiem Williams
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
