Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Cheney v. Receivables Performance Management, LLC
as 8:2012cv02505
Plaintiff:
Sarah Cheney
Defendant:
Receivables Performance Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
MFC Real Estate, LLC v. Black Horse Ventures Limited Partnership et al
as 8:2012cv00317
Plaintiff:
MFC Real Estate, LLC
Defendant:
Black Horse Ventures Limited Partnership , Nicholas Flaskay , Cheval Golf Club, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cheney Bros., Inc. v. Frank Brunkhorst Co., L.L.C.
as 1:2012cv20168
Plaintiff:
Cheney Bros., Inc.
Defendant:
Frank Brunkhorst Co., L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv01627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Kolodziej v. Mason et al
as 6:2011cv00859
Plaintiff:
Dustin S. Kolodziej
Defendant:
James Cheney Mason and J. Cheney Mason, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2010cv00506
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Grandusky-McDevitt v. Bush et al
as 1:2009cv82396
Plaintiff:
Mary Kim Grandusky-McDevitt
Defendant:
George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Carl Rove and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Grandusky-McDevitt v. Bush et al
as 9:2009cv82396
Plaintiff:
Mary Kim Grandusky-McDevitt
Defendant:
George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Carl Rove and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Cheney v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2009cv00597
Plaintiff:
Shamika Cheney and Shamika Cheney
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
