Cases 1 - 10 of 103
Stewart v. Aranas, et al.
as 23-3832
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LEWIS STEWART
Defendant / Appellant:
ROMEO ARANAS and FRANCISCO M. SANCHEZ
Defendant:
CHERYL BURSON, S.L. CLARK, JAMES COX and others
Lewis Stewart v. Romeo Aranas, et al
as 20-15586
Defendant:
CHERYL BURSON, STATE OF NEVADA, S.L. CLARK and others
Defendant / Appellant:
BRIAN E. WILLIAMS, ROMEO ARANAS, JAMES COX and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LEWIS STEWART
Curtis Downing v. Johnnie Graves, et al
as 17-15962
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS L. DOWNING
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHNNIE GRAVES, LEE GRIGGS, BRIAN E. WILLIAMS and others
Stewart v. Aranas, et al.
as 3:2017cv00132
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, Cheryl Burson, S.L. Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Lewis Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bacon v. Cox et al
as 2:2015cv01611
Plaintiff:
Percy Lavae Bacon
Defendant:
Robert Bannister, Board of Examiners, Cheryl Burson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
J. Murray v. Bryan Williams, et al
as 14-16952
Plaintiff - Appellee:
J. MICHAEL MURRAY
Defendant - Appellant:
BRYAN WILLIAMS, CHERYL BURSON and TONYA HILL
Curtis Downing v. Johnnie Graves, et al
as 14-16308
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS L. DOWNING
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHNNIE GRAVES, LEE GRIGGS, BRIAN E. WILLIAMS and others
James Atkins v. LLoyd Brewster, et al
as 14-16065
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ATKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
LLOYD BREWSTER, CHERYL BURSON, ADRIAN GUERRERO and others
Anthony Cross v. Ron Jaeger, et al
as 14-16013
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY CROSS
Defendant - Appellee:
RON JAEGER, Sergeant and CHERYL BURSON, A.W.P.
Tarz Mitchell v. USDC-NVL
as 14-70564
:
In re: TARZ DEMONE MITCHELL
Petitioner:
TARZ DEMONE MITCHELL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS
Real Party In Interest:
GREG COX, BRIAN WILLIAMS, CHERYL BURSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
