Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Motorola Corporation v. Uzan
as 14-3591
Plaintiff: Nokia Corporation
Plaintiff - Appellant: Motorola Credit Corporation, 21440 West Lake Cook Road, 6th Floor, Deer Park, Illinois 60010
Defendant-Counter-Claimant: Murat Hakan Uzan, Serve at: 100 United Nations Plaza, #46PHB New York, New York 10017 and Cem Cengiz Uzan, Serve at: 515 Park Avenue, #19 New York, New York 10022
Defendant: Motorola, Inc., Kroll Associates, Inc., Christopher B. Galvin and others
Appellee: Jordan Dubai Islamic Bank
Motorola Corporation v. Uzan
as 14-3591
Defendant: Christopher B. Galvin, Walter Keating, Kemal Uzan, Serve at: 100 United Nations Plaza, #45A New York, New York 10017 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Motorola Credit Corporation, 21440 West Lake Cook Road, 6th Floor, Deer Park, Illinois 60010
Counter Claimant: Cem Cengiz Uzan, Serve at: 515 Park Avenue, #19 New York, New York 10022 and Murat Hakan Uzan, Serve at: 100 United Nations Plaza, #46PHB New York, New York 10017
Appellee: Jordan Dubai Islamic Bank
Plaintiff: Nokia Corporation
Motorola Credit Corporation v. Uzan
as 13-2639
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross-Appellee: Motorola Credit Corporation, 21440 West Lake Cook Road, 6th Floor, Deer Park, Illinois 60010
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant: Nokia Corporation
Defendant-Counter-Claimant: Murat Hakan Uzan, Serve at: 100 United Nations Plaza, #46PHB New York, New York 10017 and Cem Cengiz Uzan, Serve at: 515 Park Avenue, #19 New York, New York 10022
Defendant: Motorola, Inc., Kroll Associates, Inc., Christopher B. Galvin and others
Appellee-Cross-Appellant: Standard Chartered Bank
Motorola Corporation v. Uzan We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-2535
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross-Appellee: Motorola Credit Corporation, 21440 West Lake Cook Road, 6th Floor, Deer Park, Illinois 60010
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant: Nokia Corporation
Defendant-Counter-Claimant: Murat Hakan Uzan, Serve at: 100 United Nations Plaza, #46PHB New York, New York 10017 and Cem Cengiz Uzan, Serve at: 515 Park Avenue, #19 New York, New York 10022
Defendant: Motorola, Inc., Kroll Associates, Inc., Christopher B. Galvin and others
Appellee-Cross-Appellant: Standard Chartered Bank
Stephen Lingis, et al.,, et al v. Rick Dorazil, et al.,, et al
as 09-2796
Plaintiff - Appellant: STEPHEN LINGIS, DONALD L. SMITH, PETER WHITE and others
Defendant - Appellee: RICK DORAZIL, MOTOROLA INCORPORATED, DAVID DEVONSHIRE and others
Amicus Curiae: CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Stephen Lingis, et al.,, et al v. Rick Dorazil, et al.,, et al
as 50-2796
Plaintiff - Appellant: STEPHEN LINGIS, DONALD L. SMITH, PETER WHITE and others
Defendant - Appellee: RICK DORAZIL, MOTOROLA INCORPORATED, DAVID DEVONSHIRE and others
Motorola, Incorporated 401(k), et al v. State of New Jersey, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1750
Plaintiff: EDWARD A. COX, JR. and PLAINTIFF CLASS
Appellant: MOTOROLA, INCORPORATED 401(K) PROFIT SHARING PLAN
Defendant: CHRISTOPHER B. GALVIN, CARL F. KOENEMANN, ROBERT L. GROWNEY and others
Appellee: STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Stephen Lingis v. Motorola Incorporated
as 08-1696
Plaintiff - Appellee: BRUCE G. HOWELL, STEPHEN LINGIS, JOHN W. ENDSLEY and others
Defendant - Appellant: MOTOROLA INCORPORATED, DAVID DEVONSHIRE, PROFIT SHARING COMMITTEE OF MOTOROLA, INCORPORATED and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-3837
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Monroe County Employees' Retirement System v. Green et al
as 1:2007cv05636
Plaintiff: Monroe County Employees' Retirement System, Monroe County Employees' Retirement System and Monroe County Employees' Retirement System
Defendant: Judson C Green, Christopher B Galvin, Richard J.A. DeLange and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?