Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00919
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01748
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Douglas v. Citibank, National Association et al
as 3:2020cv00402
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 100 inclusive, Department Stores National Bank and Citibank, National Association
Plaintiff:
Melinda Michelle Douglas
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Anderson v. Citibank, N.A.
as 3:2020cv00091
Plaintiff:
Connie Ann Anderson
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00081
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
United States of America v. GDL Livestock, LLC et al
as 6:2019cv02077
Defendant:
Gordon W. Lesina, Citibank South Dakota NA, GDL Livestock, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01960
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00780
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Tadros et al v. Wilmington Trust, National Association as Successor Trustee to Citibank, N.A. et al
as 3:2017cv01623
Defendant:
Bank of America NA, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Ashraf N. Tadros and Shaun M. Tadros
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Buchanan v. Citibank, N.A.
as 1:2017cv00727
Plaintiff:
Hartly Buchanan
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
