Cases 1 - 10 of 23
English v. CitiMortgage, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00960
Plaintiff:
Samuel English
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kelley et al v. Citimortgage, Inc.
as 1:2020cv01315
Plaintiff:
Felicia S Kelley and Shawn M Kelley
Defendant:
Citimortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Conner v. CitiMortgage Inc.
as 1:2016cv00204
Plaintiff:
Paula Conner
Defendant:
CitiMortgage Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Calhoun v. CitiMortgage, Inc.
as 1:2013cv08042
Plaintiff:
Dana G Calhoun
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Geske et al v. Federal National Mortgage ASS'N et al
as 1:2013cv07720
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Geske and Jamie Dupaw
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage ASS'N , Seterus, Inc. and CitiMortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Lincemol et al
as 1:2013cv06572
Plaintiff:
CitiMortgage, Inc.
Defendant:
Jacob Lincemol and Joseph Noby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jurasz et al v. CitiMortgage, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv05669
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jurasz and Janice Jurasz
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc., Seterus, Inc. and Federal National Mortgage Association, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
McGee et al v. CitiMortgage Inc
as 1:2013cv03652
Plaintiff:
Alfred O McGee, Jr and Barbara Keaton-McGee
Defendant:
CitiMortgage Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Avila v. CitiMortgage, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv03566
Plaintiff:
Daniel Avila
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc. and Restore Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Macon County Illinois et al v Merscorp Inc et al
as 2:2012cv02214
Plaintiff:
Macon County Illinois and Mary A. Eaton
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. , Bank of America, N.A. , Citimortgage, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
