Cases 1 - 10 of 11
WEST v. CITIMORTGAGE INC. et al
as 2:2018cv16003
Defendant:
AMI PROPERTY SERVICES, INC, CITIMORTGAGE INC., TOM MARCO REAL ESTATE INC. and others
Plaintiff:
TARIK WEST
JO ANN GASTINEAU v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
as 3:2018cv12725
Plaintiff:
JO ANN GASTINEAU
Defendant:
CITIMORTGAGE INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAGER v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC. et al
as 3:2016cv03348
Plaintiff:
DONALD HAGER
Defendant:
CITIMORTGAGE, INC., SELENE FINANCE, LP and DOES 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMITH et al v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
as 2:2015cv07629
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. SMITH and CATHLENE Y. BANKER
Defendant:
CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PERALTA et al v. APEX. MORTGAGE CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv02829
Plaintiff:
CARLOS PERALTA , JOHN ANTHONY , STEPHEN ANTONACCI and others
Defendant:
APEX. MORTGAGE CORPORATION, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. , BANK UNITED, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
JEMAS et al v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv03807
Plaintiff:
THEODORE JEMAS and JOANNE JEMAS
Defendant:
CITIMORTGAGE, INC. , NATIONAL MORTGAGE MITIGATION CO., ABC CORP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PENG et al v. CITIMORTGAGE INC.
as 1:2012cv00793
Plaintiff:
ELVIRA PENG and DANIEL CHIONG
Defendant:
CITIMORTGAGE INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FREDERICO et al v. CITIMORTGAGE INC. et al
as 2:2011cv06279
Plaintiff:
CARLOS FREDERICO and MARIA FREDERICO
Defendant:
CITIMORTGAGE INC. and SANJIV DAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GASTINEAU v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
as 3:2011cv02773
Plaintiff:
JO ANN GASTINEAU
Defendant:
CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ACOSTA et al v. TRAVELERS AUTO INSURANCE CO. OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2010cv06455
Plaintiff:
GUILLERMO ACOSTA and MILAGROS ACOSTA
Defendant:
TRAVELERS AUTO INSURANCE CO. OF NEW JERSEY, CITIMORTGAGE, INC. and JOHN DOE I-X
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
