Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Finnegan v. CITI et al
as 8:2017cv01994
Defendant:
CITI, CITI BANK N.A., CITI CORP CREDIT SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
Jack R. Finnegan
Jack R. Finnegan et al v. Citi, et al
as 8:2017cv01995
Defendant:
Maria C Chrislip, Citi, Citi Corp Credit Services and others
Plaintiff:
Jack R Finnegan
Arendas v. Citibank Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv06462
Plaintiff:
Ronald S. Arendas
Defendant:
Citibank Inc., Citibank (West) FSB, Citibank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arendas v. Citibank Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv06462
Plaintiff:
Ronald S. Arendas
Defendant:
Citibank Inc., Citibank (West) FSB, Citibank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maplewood Properties, LLC v. Citibank, N.A. et al
as 3:2010cv03980
Plaintiff:
Maplewood Properties, LLC
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A. and Citibank FSB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gurmohan Nagpal et al v. Ryland Mortgage et al
as 2:2009cv05599
Plaintiff:
Gurmohan Nagpal and Kiran Nagpal
Defendant:
Ryland Mortgage, Ryland Mortgage, Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Type:
Other Statutes
Amrhein v. Citibank Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv05101
Plaintiff:
Mike Amrhein and Mike Amrhein
Defendant:
Citibank Inc., Citibank (West), FSB, Citibank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P v. CitiBank N A
as 2:2007cv02220
Plaintiff:
Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P, Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P, Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P and others
Defendant:
CitiBank N A, T-Mobile USA Inc, T-Mobile USA Inc and others
Counter Defendant:
Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P, Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P, Ronald A Katz Technology Licensing L P and others
Counter Claimant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc, Wal-Mart Stores Inc, Wal-Mart Stores Inc and others
Special Master:
Bernard H Chao
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
