Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Garner v. Kidd et al
as 1:2022cv06270
Plaintiff:
James Garner
Defendant:
Thomas Costello, City Of Chicago, Hashtag Vision, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Garner v. City of Chicago
as 1:2022cv03185
Plaintiff:
James Garner
Defendant:
City of Chicago
Debtor In Possession:
Kim Foxx
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Crowell Bey v. City of Chicago
as 1:2019cv05284
Defendant:
City of Chicago
Plaintiff:
Phillip Vernon Crowell Bey
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Faulkner v. Gomez et al
as 1:2017cv04286
Plaintiff:
Marvin Faulkner
Defendant:
Bryan Gomez, Anna M. Loftus, Pierce & Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Veal v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2016cv11151
Plaintiff:
Tonnia Annitha Veal
Defendant:
City of Chicago and Rahm Emmanuel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bey v. Murdock et al
as 1:2016cv05777
Plaintiff:
Lyonal Lewis Bey
Defendant:
Kinyana Murdock, Sophia H Hall, Chicago Housing Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Faulkner et al v. Loftus et al
as 1:2016cv02432
Plaintiff:
Marvin Faulkner and Samuel C Umunna
Defendant:
Anna M. Loftus, William Farrow, Pierce & Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Garner et al v. Door & Window Guard Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv10553
Defendant:
Althea Kuller, PC Development Inc, Luis Vera and others
Plaintiff:
James Garner and Tina Turner
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Doe #1 et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv09052
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, Jane Doe #3 and others
Defendant:
United States of America , Patrick J. Fitzgerald, David Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Haynes v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2012cv02980
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Haynes
Defendant:
City Of Chicago , Ed H Smith and Mort Levy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
