Cases 11 - 20 of 22
State Of New York et al v. United States Department of Commerce et al
as 1:2018cv02921
Plaintiff:
State Of New York , State Of Connecticut , State of Delaware and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Commerce , Bureau of the Census , Wilbur L. Ross, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
In Re: Kirstjen M. Nielsen
as 17-3345
Petitioner:
Kevin McAleenan, Secretary of Homeland Security, Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General, Donald J. Trump, President of the United States and others
Respondent:
Martin Jonathan Batall Vidal, Make the Road New York, Antonio Alarcon and others
Amicus Curiae:
City of Los Angeles, California, City of Austin, Texas, City of Boston, Massachusetts and others
In Re: Elaine Duke
as 17-3345
Petitioner:
Elaine C. Duke, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General, Donald J. Trump, President of the United States and others
Respondent:
Martin Jonathan Batall Vidal, Make the Road New York, Antonio Alarcon and others
Amicus Curiae:
City of Los Angeles, California, City of Austin, Texas, City of Boston, Massachusetts and others
Movant:
6Sense Insights, Inc., A Medium Corporation, Adobe Systems Incorporated and others
United States of America et al v. Astrazeneca Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01718
Defendant:
AstraZenca, L.P., AstraZeneca PLC, Astrazenca Pharmaceuticals, LP and others
Plaintiff:
New York State, States of California, Deleware, Connecticut,, The City of Chicago and others
Movant:
United States of America
Relator:
Allison Zayas
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
United States of America, et al v. Dr. Reddy's Inc., et al
as 1:2013cv03779
Plaintiff:
United States of America , State of California , State of Delaware and others
Defendant:
Dr. Reddy's Inc. , Omnicare, Inc. and Neighborcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Retirement Board Of The Police v. The Bank of New York Mellon
as 13-1777
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Retirement Board Of The Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund Of The City Of Chicago, (on Behalf of Itself and Similarly Situated Certificate Holders), Westmoreland County Employee Retirement System, City of Grand Rapids General Retirement System and others
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
The Bank of New York Mellon
Retirement Board Of The Police v. The Bank of New York Mellon
as 13-1776
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Retirement Board Of The Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund Of The City Of Chicago, on Behalf of Itself and Similarly Situated Certificate Holders, Westmoreland County Employee Retirement System, City of Grand Rapids General Retirement System and others
Defendant - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
The Bank of New York Mellon,, as Trustee Under Various Pooling and Servicing Agreements
Retirement Board Of The Police v. The Bank of New York Mellon
as 13-661
Petitioner-Cross-Respondent:
Retirement Board Of The Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund Of The City Of Chicago, (on Behalf of Itself and Similarly Situated Certificate Holders), Westmoreland County Employee Retirement System, City of Grand Rapids General Retirement System and others
Respondent-Cross-Petitioner:
The Bank of New York Mellon, (as Trustee Under Various Pooling and Servicing Agreements)
Retirement Board of the Police v. The Bank of New York Mellon
as 13-664
Petitioner-Cross-Respondent:
The Bank of New York Mellon, (as Trustee Under Various Pooling and Servicing Agreements)
Respondent-Cross-Petitioner:
Retirement Board Of The Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund Of The City Of Chicago, (on Behalf of Itself and Similarly Situated Certificate Holders), Westmoreland County Employee Retirement System, City of Grand Rapids General Retirement System and others
Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund Of The City Of Chicago v. Bank of America, NA et al
as 1:2012cv02865
Plaintiff:
Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund Of The City Of Chicago
Defendant:
Bank of America, NA and U.S. Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
