Cases 61 - 70 of 103
Cabada v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2014cv06759
Defendant:
City of Chicago and Southwest Airlines Co.
Plaintiff:
Aideth Cabada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robert et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2014cv03899
Plaintiff:
Farnik S. Robert and Andzelika Jastrzebska
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Chicago Police Department and Marian Horan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ferguson v. Chicago et al
as 1:2013cv06488
Plaintiff:
Sheila Ferguson
Defendant:
City of Chicago and Anthony Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schoenbach v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2013cv05953
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Schoenbach
Defendant:
City Of Chicago and Amtrak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fredrickson v. City Of Chicago
as 1:2013cv00799
Plaintiff:
Diane M Fredrickson
Defendant:
City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Vincent Piscopo v. Rahm Emanuel, et al
as 13-1080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT PISCOPO
Defendant - Appellee:
RAHM EMANUEL, GARRY MCCARTHY and RETIREMENT BOARD OF THE POLICEMAN'S ANNUITY AND BENEFIT FUND FOR THE CITY OF CHICAGO
BATES, et al., v. DENTSPLY INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al.,
as 2:2012cv07199
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COLORADO and others
Defendant:
DENTSPLY INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Movant:
WELLSPECT HEALTHCARE
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Russian v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2012cv06889
Plaintiff:
Carlos Russian
Defendant:
The City of Chicago and K Navarro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2012cv06858
Plaintiff:
Areva Williams
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Genghis K. Harris, Patrick Golden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Piscopo v. Emanuel et al
as 1:2012cv05856
Defendant:
Rahm Emanuel, Retirement Board of the Policeman's Annuity and Benefit Fund for the City of Chicago Illinois and Gerry McCarthy
Plaintiff:
Vincent Piscopo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
