Cases 1 - 10 of 16
General Retirement System of the City of Detroit v. AT&T Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07351
Plaintiff:
General Retirement System of the City of Detroit
Defendant:
AT&T Inc., John Stankey, Randall L. Stephenson and others
Petitioner:
Velliv, Pension & Livsforsikring A/S, Bridget N. Smagala Revocable Trust U/A DTD, New Mexico State Investment Council and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
The Police & Fire Retirement System City of Detroit v. Argo Group International Holdings, Ltd. et al
as 1:2022cv08971
Plaintiff:
The Police & Fire Retirement System City of Detroit
Defendant:
Argo Group International Holdings, Ltd., Thomas A. Bradley, Scott Kirk and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
City of Livonia Retiree Health and Disability Benefits Plan v. Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated et al
as 1:2019cv10528
Defendant:
Andreas W. Mattes, Christopher A. Chapman, Juergen Wunram and others
Petitioner:
Indiana Laborers Pension and Welfare Funds, Neelam Arora, University of Puerto Rico Retirement System and others
Plaintiff:
City of Livonia Retiree Health and Disability Benefits Plan
In re Diebold Nixdorf, Inc. Securities Litigation.
as 1:2019cv06180
Defendant:
Christopher A. Chapman, Andreas W. Mattes and Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Selwyn Karp, General Retirement System of the City of Detroit, City of Dearborn Heights ACT 345 Police and Fire Retirement System and others
Petitioner:
Neelam Arora and Manoj Arora
Lead Plaintiff:
Indiana Laborers Pension and Welfare Funds
Consolidated Defendant:
Juergen Wunram
Consolidated Plaintiff:
City of Livonia Retiree Health and Disability Benefits Plan
REVOLUTION LIGHTING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION
as 1:2019cv00980
Defendant:
James A. DePalma, Revolution Lighting Technologies, Inc., Robert V. LaPenta and others
Plaintiff:
James Glavan
Petitioner:
Patrick Graham, Craig Holman, Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Bob Bishop
Police and Fire Retirement System of the of Detroit et al v. Watkins et al
as 1:2011mc00119
Plaintiff:
Police and Fire Retirement System of the of Detroit and General Retirement System of the City of Detroit
Defendant:
Donald V. Watkins and Watkins Aviation, LLC
Thirdparty_defendant:
North Point Advisors, LLC, Adrian Anderson and Jeffrey Conry
Cause Of Action: M 08-85 Motion to Quash
General Retirement System of the City of Detroit et al v. Morgan Stanley et al
as 1:2010cv05823
Plaintiff:
General Retirement System of the City of Detroit
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley, Morgan Stanley and Co., Incorporated, Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
The Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit v. Goldman Sachs & Co. et al
as 1:2010cv04429
Plaintiff:
The Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit
Defendant:
Goldman Sachs & Co. , Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company , GS Mortgage Securities Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
In Re: AOL Time Securities, et al v. , et al
as 1:2002cv05575
Plaintiff:
Jennifer J. Fadem , Salomon Hami and Dominic F. Amarosa
Defendant:
Ernst & Young LLP
Movant:
Mark Bluesein, McClure Family Trust , Gary J. Tweed and others
Consolidated_plaintiff:
Steven Schmalz , Mariam Antin , Mark Bluestein and others
Petitioner:
Cynthia R. Levin Moulton
Appellant:
BizProLink LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit et al v. Indymac MBS, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv04583
Plaintiff:
Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit, Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit, Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit and others
Defendant:
Indymac MBS, Inc., Residential Asset Securitization Trust 2006-A5CB, Indymac INDX Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-AR9 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
