Cases 31 - 38 of 38
ClearOne Communications, Inc., v. Biamp Systems, et al
as 09-4097
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CLEARONE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Utah corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
BIAMP SYSTEMS, an Oregon corporation
Defendant:
ANDREW CHIANG, JUN YANG, WIDEBAND SOLUTIONS, a Massachusetts corporation and others
ClearOne Communications, Inc., v. Chiang, et al
as 09-4094
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CLEARONE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Utah corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
ANDREW CHIANG
Defendant:
JUN YANG, WIDEBAND SOLUTIONS, a Massachusetts corporation, VERSATILE DSP, a Massachusetts corporation and others
ClearOne Communications,Inc. v. Yang
as 09-4092
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CLEARONE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Utah corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
JUN YANG
Defendant:
ANDREW CHIANG, WIDEBAND SOLUTIONS, a Massachusetts corporation, VERSATILE DSP, a Massachusetts corporation and others
ClearOne Communications v. JAS Forwarding USA
as 2:2009cv00450
Plaintiff:
ClearOne Communications, ClearOne Communications and ClearOne Communications
Defendant:
JAS Forwarding USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Flood v. Clearone Communications
as 09-4065
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FRANCES M. FLOOD
Defendant - Appellant:
CLEARONE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Utah Corporation
Flood v. Clearone Communications
as 09-4017
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FRANCES M. FLOOD
Defendant - Appellant:
CLEARONE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Utah Corporation
Flood v. ClearOne Communications
as 2:2008cv00631
Plaintiff:
Frances M. Flood and Frances M. Flood
Defendant:
ClearOne Communications
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ClearOne Communications v. Chiang et al
as 2:2007cv00037
Plaintiff:
ClearOne Communications, ClearOne Communications, ClearOne Communications and others
Defendant:
Andrew Chiang, Andrew Chiang, Andrew Chiang and others
Intervenor:
David Sullivan, David Sullivan and David Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
