Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Crider v. Carborundum Company,Incorporated et al
as 8:2009cv01240
Plaintiff:
Lora Crider
Defendant:
Carborundum Company,Incorporated, Cleaver-Brooks, Inc., Crane Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Brecker v. American Standard, Inc. et al
as 8:2009cv00550
Plaintiff:
Delores M. Brecker
Defendant:
American Standard, Inc., Chrysler LLC, Cleaver Brooks, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Estep et al v. Cleaver-Brooks, Inc. et al
as 8:2009cv00188
Plaintiff:
John L. Estep, John L. Estep, Leona M. Estep and others
Defendant:
Cleaver-Brooks, Inc., Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Reaser et al v. A.W. Chesterton Co. et al
as 8:2008cv01323
Plaintiff:
Robert Reaser, Robert Reaser, Robert Reaser and others
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Co., Afton Pumps, Inc., Alfa Laval, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Wingfield v. Georgia Pacific Corporation et al
as 1:2007cv02175
Plaintiff:
Emmett Wingfield, Emmett Wingfield and Emmett Wingfield
Defendant:
Georgia Pacific Corporation, ABEX Corporation, Abney Mills and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
Rust Engineering & Construction, Inc. and Rust Engineering & Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Reeves v. American Optical Corporation et al
as 0:2007cv61264
Plaintiff:
Jackie Reeves and Jackie Reeves
Defendant:
American Optical Corporation, American Optical Corporation, Aqua-Chem, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Thomas v. Amercable,Inc et al.
as 0:2007cv60497
Plaintiff:
Deborah Thomas and Robert L. Thomas
Defendant:
Amercable,Inc, American Optical Corporation, A.W. Chesterton Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
