Cases 51 - 60 of 202
COLLINS et al v. AC&S, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv62275
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD COLLINS and MARY COLLINS
Defendant:
AC&S, INC. , CELOTEX CORPORATION , EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. NETTLES
as 2:2011cv32067
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD T. NETTLES and CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, AC AND S, INC., ACORN IRON & SUPPLY CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
BOBO v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2011cv31692
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD J. BOBO
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC F/K/A NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MILES v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2011cv31654
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD L. MILES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A. P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC F/K/A NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
JENNINGS v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2010cv57848
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD JENNINGS
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
HARRIS v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2010cv57918
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD E HARRIS
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
SHARPE v. A C & S, INC.
as 2:2010cv84882
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD M. SHARPE
Defendant:
A C & S, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NICHOLSON v. W.R. GRACE & CO.
as 2:2010cv83932
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD D. NICHOLSON
Defendant:
W.R. GRACE & CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROBINSON v. A C & S, INC.
as 2:2010cv84695
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD W. ROBINSON
Defendant:
A C & S, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MASTRICOLA et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS CORP. et al
as 2:2010cv83535
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD F. MASTRICOLA and JEANNE M. MASTRICOLA
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS CORP. , PITTSBURGH CORNING CORP., EAGLE PICHER INDUSTRIES INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
