Cases 1 - 4 of 4
DMJ Associates, L.L.C. v. Capasso
as 16-3435
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant:
DMJ Associates, L.L.C., AKA DMJ Associates, L.L.C.
Def-Third-Party-Plaintiff-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
Exxon Mobil Corporation and Quanta Resource Corporation
Defendant-Counter-Claimant:
Clairol, Incorporated, Basf Corporation, Powell Duffryn Terminals, Inc. and others
Third-Party-Plaintiff:
Paribas North America
Third-Party-Defendant:
EQ Northeast, Inc., AKA Franklin Environmental Services, Inc., FKA Franklin Pumping Service, Coastal Oil New York, Inc, Alcan Aluminum Corporation, AKA Alcan Sheet & Plate and others
Defendant:
Carl A. Capasso, Darling International, Inc., Russell W. Mahler and others
City of New York v. Amerada Hess Corp.
as 14-3224
Defendant:
Marathon Ashland Petroleum LLC, Leemilt's Petroleum Inc., Motiva Enterprises, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Mobile Corporation, ExxonMobil Oil Corporation and Exxon Mobil Corporation
Plaintiff / Appellee:
City of New York, New York City Water Board and New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority
City of New York v. Amerada Hess Corp.
as 14-3224
Plaintiff - Appellee:
City of New York, New York City Water Board and New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority
Defendant:
Amerada Hess Corp., Atlantic Richfield Company, BP America, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Exxon Mobil Corporation, Exxon Mobil Oil Corporation and Mobile Corporation
The City of New York v. Amerada Hess Corp.
as 1:2004cv03417
Defendant:
El Paso CGP Company doing business as Coastal Oil New York, Inc. formerly known as Coastal Corporation, TRMI Holdings Inc., Marathon Ashland Petroleum LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Water Finance Agency, The Water Board and The City of New York
Petitioner:
Gary Stumpf, Thomas M Milton, Meena Nainan and others
Material Witne:
Barker Hamill
Special Master:
Ronald J. Hedges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 pi Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
