Cases 1 - 6 of 6
COFFIN et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2021cv03287
Plaintiff:
LORI WILLIAMS, MARLA COFFIN and THE ESTATE OF LORI WILLIAMS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. F/K/A JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SEMINOFF et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv20094
Plaintiff:
LISA SEMINOFF and THE ESTATE OF BARBARA COFFIN
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COFFIN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv12288
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
CARRIE COFFIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COFFIN v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2018cv17767
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENEA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA A. COFFIN
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COFFIN et al v. MERCK, SHARP & DOHME, CORP.
as 3:2013cv00850
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN T. COFFIN
Defendant:
MERCK, SHARP & DOHME, CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Torres v. Iler et al
as 3:2011cv05187
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO TORRES
Defendant:
Jennifer M. Iler, Kevin J. Iler, Dawn M. Griffin and others
Cross_claimant:
Kevin J. Iler, Jennifer M. Iler, Sabrina M. Coffin and others
Cross_defendant:
Sabrina M. Coffin, Dawn M. Griffin, Jennifer M. Iler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
