Cases 21 - 30 of 70
Christopher Jones v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 12-16571
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER A. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden, BACA, COLE MORROW and others
Paul McCreary v. Brian Sandoval, et al
as 12-16482
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL THOMAS MCCREARY
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN SANDOVAL, BRUCE BANNISTER, B. CONNECT and others
Dotson v. State Of Nevada et al
as 2:2012cv00997
Defendant:
Linda Adams, Romeo Aranas, Isador Baca and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dotson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keith Kemp v. Howard Skolnik, et al
as 12-16259
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH KEMP
Defendant - Appellee:
HOWARD SKOLNIK, Director of NDOC, DWIGHT NEVENS, Warden of HDSP, ISIDRO BACA, Associate Warden at HDSP and others
Paul McCreary v. Brian Sandoval, et al
as 12-16230
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL THOMAS MCCREARY
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN SANDOVAL, BRUCE BANNISTER, B. CONNECT and others
Armis Arrendondo v. D. Neven, et al
as 12-15970
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARMIS ARRENDONDO
Defendant - Appellee:
D. W. NEVEN, ISIDRO BACA, HOWARD SKOLNIK, Director and others
King v. Neven et al
as 2:2012cv00572
Defendant:
Scott Alexander, Maintenance Mike, Cole Morrow and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew James King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Pattison v. Morrow et al
as 2:2012cv00315
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Cole Morrow
Petitioner:
Dante Hanalei Pattison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCreary v. Sandoval et al
as 2:2012cv00317
Defendant:
Bruce Bannister, B Connect, James Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Paul McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Damon Campbell v. Colin Brown, et al
as 11-17464
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAMON L. CAMPBELL
Defendant - Appellee:
COLIN BROWN, CONRAD SCHAFF, ISIDRO BACA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
