Cases 1 - 6 of 6
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF NOUVEAU ELEVATOR INDUSTRIES, LLC v. VALIANT GROUP, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv22423
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF NOUVEAU ELEVATOR INDUSTRIES, LLC and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
VALIANT GROUP, LLC and COLONIAL SURETY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF BREAKER ELECTRIC, INC. v. VALIANT GROUP, LLC
as 3:2023cv16815
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF BREAKER ELECTRIC, INC.
Defendant:
VALIANT GROUP, LLC, COLONIAL SURETY COMPANY and JOHN DOES 1-3
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act
COLONIAL SURETY COMPANY v. ALPHA SOFTWARE, INC.
as 2:2017cv01701
Plaintiff:
COLONIAL SURETY COMPANY
Defendant:
ALPHA SOFTWARE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
UNITED STATES FOR THE USE OF CIRIGHT AUTOMATION, LLC et al v. VOLMAR CONSTRUCTION, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv07586
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES FOR THE USE OF CIRIGHT AUTOMATION, and TRISTATE HVAC EQUIPMENT LLP
Defendant:
VOLMAR CONSTRUCTION, INC., TJB AIR CONDITIONING, LLC., TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA for the use of ADVANCED PLUMBING DESIGN, INC. v. COLONIAL SURETY COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv06038
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA for the use of ADVANCED PLUMBING DESIGN, INC.
Defendant:
COLONIAL SURETY COMPANY and PARTNER REINSURANCE COMPANY OF THE U.S.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
JAFCO SUPPLY CORP. v. COLONIAL SURETY COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv01361
Plaintiff:
JAFCO SUPPLY CORP.
Defendant:
COLONIAL SURETY COMPANY, PARTNER REINSURANCE COMPANY OF THE U.S. and AJAY CONSTRUCTION & ELECTRICAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
