Cases 31 - 40 of 25,612
Carruthers v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv01963
Plaintiff:
Cristi Carruthers
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Christmas v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv01976
Plaintiff:
Robin T. Christmas
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Joseph Martino, Jr. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 24-11438
Petitioner:
JOSEPH ANTHONY MARTINO, JR.
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Michael Hayes v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 24-11434
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HAYES
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Patricia Johnson v. Acting Commissioner of Social Security
as 24-11459
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA JOHNSON
Defendant:
ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Turek v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2024cv01074
Plaintiff:
Ashlee Turek
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Frank v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Courtney Frank
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Brown v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Keisha Brown
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Neeley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Lynn L. Neeley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Metler Tonnessen v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 9:2024cv80578
Plaintiff:
Autumn Metler Tonnessen
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
