Cases 1 - 10 of 4,394
MORGAN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv06277
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH MORGAN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
FATUZZO II v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv06239
Plaintiff:
JOHN FATUZZO II
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
SHARPE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv04067
Plaintiff:
WESLEY JOHN SHARPE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
RODRIGUEZ v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv06221
Plaintiff:
JUANA J. RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CALERDON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv06217
Plaintiff:
DAVID CALERDON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
MEDINA v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv06163
Plaintiff:
ANA J MEDINA
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
KOCI v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv06138
Plaintiff:
RAMAZAN KOCI
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
PATTERSON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv06147
Plaintiff:
STACY PATTERSON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
RAMOS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv05960
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY RAMOS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
WOODEN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv05978
Plaintiff:
ALICE G. WOODEN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
