Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Staples v. Meredith Corp.
as 1:2016cv01919
Movant:
Staples, Inc.
Respondent:
Meredith Corp.
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission , District Of Columbia and Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Defendant:
Staples, Inc. and Office Depot, Inc.
Claimant:
John Doe , Amazon.Com, Inc. , American Automobile Association (Inc.) and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Federal Trade Commission v. Board Of Education Of The City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2016cv00839
Respondent:
Board Of Education Of The City Of Chicago
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission , Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and District of Columbia
Defendant:
Staples, Inc. and Office Depot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
State of Michigan, et al v. United States Army Corps of En, et al
as 12-3800
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, STATE OF WISCONSIN, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO
Intervenor - Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, COALITION TO SAVE OUR WATERWAYS and WENDELLA SIGHTSEEING COMPANY, INCORPORATED
State of Michigan, et al v. United States Army Corps of E, et al
as 10-3891
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, STATE OF WISCONSIN, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO
Intervenor:
CITY OF CHICAGO, COALITION TO SAVE OUR WATERWAYS and WENDELLA SIGHTSEEING COMPANY, INCORPORATED
Plaintiff - Intervenor:
GRAND TRAVERSE BAND OF OTTAWA AND CHIPPEWA INDIANS
State of Michigan, et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 1:2010cv04457
Plaintiff:
State of Wisconsin , State of Michigan , State of Minnesota and others
Defendant:
United States Army Corps Of Engineers and Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. ยง 181
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
