Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Conair Corporation et al v. Taizhou Jinba Health Technology Co., LTD.
as 2:2015cv01328
Plaintiff:
Babyliss Faco SPRL and Conair Corporation
Defendant:
Taizhou Jinba Health Technology CO., LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Conair Corporation et al v. Le Angelique, Inc.
as 2:2014cv01149
Plaintiff:
Babyliss Faco SPRL and Conair Corporation
Defendant:
Le Angelique, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Conair Corporation et al v. INF Professional
as 2:2014cv01150
Plaintiff:
Babyliss Faco SPRL and Conair Corporation
Defendant:
INF Professional
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Not Used
as 2:2014cv01148
Defendant:
Babyliss Faco SPRL and Conair Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Tre Milano, LLC et al v. Conair Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv02735
Defendant:
Conair Corporation and Does
Plaintiff:
MM&R Products, Inc. and Tre Milano, LLC
Sexy Hair Concepts, LLC v. Conair Corporation
as 2:2012cv02218
Counter Claimant:
Conair Corporation
Defendant:
Conair Corporation
Counter Defendant:
Sexy Hair Concepts, LLC
Plaintiff:
Sexy Hair Concepts, LLC
Moroccanoil, Inc. v. Conair Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv05571
Defendant:
Conair Corporation and Does
Plaintiff:
Moroccanoil, Inc.
TRE Milano, LLC v. Conair Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv04827
Defendant:
Conair Corporation and Does
Plaintiff:
TRE Milano, LLC
Simplehuman, LLC v. Cuisinart Corporation, et al
as 2:2009cv01373
Plaintiff:
Simplehuman, LLC, Simplehuman, LLC, Simplehuman, LLC and others
Defendant:
Lifetime Brands, Inc. and Conair Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Sorensen v. Conair Corporation et al
as 3:2008cv01256
Plaintiff:
Jens Erik Sorensen and Jens Erik Sorensen
Defendant:
Conair Corporation and DOES
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
