Cases 1 - 3 of 3
Desmarattes v. Consolidated Edison, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv04723
Defendant:
Consolidated Edison, Inc. doing business as Consolidated Edison Company of New York, LJ Ross Associates, Inc. and Sunrise Credit Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Melinda Desmarattes
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
McCracken v. Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 3, LLC et al
as 1:2008cv02670
Plaintiff:
Ted A. McCracken
Defendant:
Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 3, LLC, Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2, LLC, General Electric Company and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
In Re: World Trade Center Disaster Site Litigation
as 1:2021mc00100
Defendant:
Phillips and Jordan , The Westfield Group , Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
The City of New York, The Federal Emergency Management Agency, The United States Department of Defense and others
Cross_defendant:
The Westfield Group, The City of New York, 1 WTC Holdings L.L.C. and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Tully Construction Co., Inc. , Bovis Holdings Limited , Bovis International, Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
Tully Construction Co., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Blanca Goffredo , Frank Goffredo , Bernard Stinchcomb and others
Cross_claimant:
Tully Construction Co., Inc. , Consolidated Edison Communications Holding Company, Inc. , Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. and others
Consolidated_plaintiff:
Robert Suarez, Antonio E. Alves , Maria E. Alves and others
Movant:
Michelle Haskett-Godbee and United States
Pecial_master:
James A. Henderson, Jr. and Aaron D. Twerski
Claimant:
Kevin Fitzpatrick
Appellant:
Plaintiffs
Debtor:
Tishman Construction Corporation of Manhattan, Tishman Construction Corporation of New York, Tishman Interiors Corporation
Consolidated_defendant:
Mark Gajewski
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 40101 Air Trans. Safety and Sys. Stabilization Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
