Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Desmarattes v. Consolidated Edison, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv04723
Defendant: Consolidated Edison, Inc. doing business as Consolidated Edison Company of New York, LJ Ross Associates, Inc. and Sunrise Credit Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: Melinda Desmarattes
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
National Coalition for Advance, et al v. EPA, et al
as 20-1175
Petitioner: Consolidated Edison, Inc., National Coalition for Advanced Transportation, Power Companies Climate Coalition and others
Respondent: United States Department of Transportation, Environmental Protection Agency and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Calpine Corporation, et al v. EPA, et al
as 20-1177
Petitioner: Consolidated Edison, Inc., Power Companies Climate Coalition, National Grid USA and others
Respondent: United States Department of Transportation, Environmental Protection Agency and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT et al v. CHAO et al
as 1:2019cv03436
Defendant: Sec. ELAINE L. CHAO, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION and others
Plaintiff: SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, BAY AREA AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT and SACRAMENTO METROPOLITAN AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
Petitioner: CALPINE CORPORATION, POWER COMPANIES CLIMATE COALITION, NEW YORK POWER AUTHORITY and others
Intervenor Defendant: ASSOCIATION OF GLOBAL AUTOMAKERS, INC.
Intervenor: COALITION FOR SUSTAINABLE AUTOMOTIVE REGULATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Calpine Corporation, et al v. EPA, et al
as 19-1245
Petitioner: Consolidated Edison, Inc., Power Companies Climate Coalition, National Grid USA and others
Respondent: United States Department of Transportation, Environmental Protection Agency and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Consolidated Edison, Inc., et al v. EPA
as 19-1188
Petitioner: Consolidated Edison, Inc., Sacramento Municipal Utility District, Exelon Corporation and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency
UPS Freight, Inc. v. Consolidated Edison, Inc.
as 1:2014cv03581
Plaintiff: UPS Freight, Inc.
Defendant: Consolidated Edison, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv04222
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 151 Communications Act of 1934
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00867
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
In Re: World Trade Center Disaster Site Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021mc00100
Defendant: Phillips and Jordan , The Westfield Group , Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. and others
Thirdparty_defendant: The City of New York, The Federal Emergency Management Agency, The United States Department of Defense and others
Cross_defendant: The Westfield Group, The City of New York, 1 WTC Holdings L.L.C. and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff: Tully Construction Co., Inc. , Bovis Holdings Limited , Bovis International, Inc. and others
Counter_claimant: Tully Construction Co., Inc.
Plaintiff: Blanca Goffredo , Frank Goffredo , Bernard Stinchcomb and others
Cross_claimant: Tully Construction Co., Inc. , Consolidated Edison Communications Holding Company, Inc. , Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. and others
Consolidated_plaintiff: Robert Suarez, Antonio E. Alves , Maria E. Alves and others
Movant: Michelle Haskett-Godbee and United States
Pecial_master: James A. Henderson, Jr. and Aaron D. Twerski
Claimant: Kevin Fitzpatrick
Appellant: Plaintiffs
Debtor: Tishman Construction Corporation of Manhattan, Tishman Construction Corporation of New York, Tishman Interiors Corporation
Consolidated_defendant: Mark Gajewski
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 40101 Air Trans. Safety and Sys. Stabilization Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?