Cases 1 - 10 of 154
Construction Industry Retirement Fund of Rockford, Illinois and Construction Industry Welfare Fund of Rockford, Illinois v. CMF Group, Inc.
as 3:2024cv50108
Plaintiff:
Construction Industry Retirement Fund of Rockford, Illinois and Construction Industry Welfare Fund of Rockford, Illinois
Defendant:
CMF Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
The Construction Industry Retirement Fund of Rockford, Illinois v. The Henley Group, LLC
as 3:2024cv50091
Plaintiff:
The Construction Industry Retirement Fund of Rockford, Illinois
Defendant:
The Henley Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
The Construction Industry Retirement Fund of Rockford, Illinois et al v. Aspen Construction System, Inc.
as 3:2023cv50422
Plaintiff:
The Construction Industry Retirement Fund of Rockford, Illinois and The Construction Industry Welfare Fund of Rockford, Illinois, The Construction Industry Welfare Fund of Rockford, Illinois and The Construction Industry Retirement Fund of Rockford, Illinois
Defendant:
Aspen Construction System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Construction Industry Retirement Fund of Rockford, Illinois and Construction Industry Welfare Fund of Rockford, Illinois v. Modern Builders Contractors, Inc.
as 3:2023cv50406
Plaintiff:
Construction Industry Retirement Fund of Rockford, Illinois and Construction Industry Welfare Fund of Rockford, Illinois
Defendant:
Modern Builders Contractors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Construction Industry Retirement Fund of Rockford, Illinois and Construction Industry Welfare Fund of Rockford, Illinois v. AtCo Masonry LLC
as 3:2023cv50313
Plaintiff:
Construction Industry Retirement Fund of Rockford, Illinois and Construction Industry Welfare Fund of Rockford, Illinois
Defendant:
AtCo Masonry LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Construction Industry Retirement Fund of Rockford, Illinois and Construction Industry Welfare Fund of Rockford, Illinois v. Commercial Flooring Contractors of Loves Park
as 3:2023cv50140
Plaintiff:
Construction Industry Retirement Fund of Rockford, Illinois and Construction Industry Welfare Fund of Rockford, Illinois
Defendant:
Commercial Flooring Contractors of Loves Park
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
The Construction Industry Retirement Fund of Rockford, Illinois v. Montefusco Heating & Sheet Metal
as 3:2023cv50121
Plaintiff:
The Construction Industry Retirement Fund of Rockford, Illinois
Defendant:
Montefusco Heating & Sheet Metal
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
The Construction Industry Retirement Fund of Rockford, Illinois and The Construction Industry Welfare Fund of Rockford, Illinois v. Porter Brothers Asphalt & Sealing, Inc.
as 3:2022cv50424
Plaintiff:
The Construction Industry Retirement Fund of Rockford, Illinois and The Construction Industry Welfare Fund of Rockford, Illinois
Defendant:
Porter Brothers Asphalt & Sealing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Construction Industry Retirement Fund of Rockford, Illinois and Construction Industry Welfare Fund of Rockford, Illinois v. Mr. David's Carpet Service Ltd.
as 3:2022cv50395
Plaintiff:
Construction Industry Retirement Fund of Rockford, Illinois and Construction Industry Welfare Fund of Rockford, Illinois
Defendant:
Mr. David's Carpet Service Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Construction Industry Retirement Fund Of Rockford Illinois et al v. Calacci Construction Co., Inc.
as 3:2022cv50269
Plaintiff:
Construction Industry Retirement Fund Of Rockford Illinois and Construction Industry Welfare Fund Of Rockford Illinois
Defendant:
Calacci Construction Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
