Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern California et al v. Meketa Investment Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv07726
Plaintiff:
Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern California, the Board of Trustees for the Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern California and each on behalf of the Construction Laborers Pension Plan for Southern California
Defendant:
Meketa Investment Group, Inc. and Judy Chambers
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Board of Trustees of the Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern California v. MCEC, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04175
Defendant:
MCEC, Inc., DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern California
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1381
Board of Trustees of the Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern California v. H.J. Hunsaker Construction, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03464
Defendant:
H.J. HUNSAKER CONSTRUCTION, INC. a California corporation doing business as HH CONSTRUCTION and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern California
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Lu v. Align Technology, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv06720
Defendant:
John F. Morici, Raphael S. Pascaud, Joseph M. Hogan and others
Plaintiff:
Xiaojiao Lu, David Infuso and SEB Investment Management AB
Petitioner:
Muhammad M. Abbas, John Del Gaiso, Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern California and others
Purple Mountain Trust v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
as 3:2018cv03948
Petitioner:
Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern California and Jyontindra Patel
Defendant:
John Richard Shrewsberry, Wells Fargo & Company, Timothy J. Sloan and others
Plaintiff:
PURPLE MOUNTAIN TRUST
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
CONSTRUCTION LABORERS TRUST FUNDS FOR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE COMPANY, a Delaware limited liabiity company; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE OF LABORERS HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST FUND FO v. ABSOLUTE OUTDOOR, INC., a California corporation e
as 5:2016cv01884
Defendant:
Absolute Outdoor, Inc., CDM Constructors Inc., a Massachusetts corporation, CDM Constructors, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Center for Contract Compliance, Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern California, Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company and others
Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company et al v. Global Green Construction Inc et al
as 2:2012cv10605
Defendant:
American Contractors Indemnity Company, Bayley Construction, Cox Construction Co and others
Plaintiff:
Center for Contract Compliance, Construction Laborers Pension Trust For Southern California, Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company and others
Gonzaba v. Board of Trustees of the Construction Laborers Pension Trust of Southern California et al
as 3:2011cv02316
Plaintiff:
Yvonne K. Gonzaba
Defendant:
Board of Trustees of the Construction Laborers Pension Trust of Southern California, San Diego County Construction Laborers' Pension Trust and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company v. Christian Brothers Services Inc et al
as 2:2007cv00690
Plaintiff:
Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company and Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company
Defendant:
Christian Brothers Services Inc, Oscar Daniel Albillo, American Contractors Indemnity Company and others
Cross Claimant:
American Contractors Indemnity Company, American Contractors Indemnity Company and Christian Brothers Services Inc
Cross Defendant:
Does 1-20, Christian Brothers Services Inc, Oscar Daniel Albillo and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
