Cases 21 - 29 of 29
CLARK v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2020cv20614
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK INCORPORATED, COOK GROUP INCORPORATED and others
Plaintiff:
BERNADETTE CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SANTIAGO v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2020cv15798
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC F/K/A COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED and COOK GROUP INCORPORATED
Plaintiff:
VANESSA SANTIAGO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SANTIAGO v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 3:2020cv15798
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED and others
Plaintiff:
VANESSA SANTIAGO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KENNEDY v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 3:2020cv14427
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED, COOK GROUP INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
VERDICA KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 3:2020cv14380
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL, LLC, COOK INCORPORATED, WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RANDOLPH v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2013cv04207
Plaintiff:
BERNICE RANDOLPH
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ETHICON, INC, ETHICON, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JORDAN et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2013cv04202
Plaintiff:
CHERYL JORDAN and HAROLD E. JORDAN
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ETHICON, INC., ETHICON, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RODGERS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2013cv04162
Plaintiff:
DIANE RODGERS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ETHICON, INC., ETHICON, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WARD et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2013cv04163
Plaintiff:
RHONDA WARD and JERRY WARD
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ETHICON, INC., ETHICON, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
