Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Danny Sabana v. CoreLogic, Inc. et al
as 8:2023cv00965
Plaintiff:
Danny Sabana
Defendant:
CoreLogic, Inc., The Retirement Plan Committee of Corelogic, Inc. 401(K) Savings Plan and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Harriett Mitchell v. CoreLogic, Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv02274
Plaintiff:
Harriett Mitchell, Jason Summers and Joseph Adams
Defendant:
CoreLogic, Inc., CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, Does 1-10, inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
In Re: Bank of New York Mellon Corporation Foreign Exchange Transactions Litigation
as 1:2012md02335
Defendant:
Arthur Certosimo, Michael J. Kowalski, Samuel C. Scott, III and others
Plaintiff:
Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System, Lisa Parker, Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Retirement Plan and others
Claimant:
Bridgestone Americas, Inc., Bechtel Corporation, SYNNEX Corporation and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Ohio Police & Fire Pension Fund, Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, United States Of America and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Bart Florence, Paul Bensi, Jerry Kalmer and others
Petitioner:
Union Asset Management Holding AG, Ironworkers Locals 40, 361 & 417 - Union Security Funds, DeKalb County Pension Fund and others
Interested Party:
David Nichols
Nominal Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation
Not Classified By Court:
Non-Party June Kim
Lead Plaintiff:
State of Oregon By and Through the Oregon State Treasurer on Behalf of the Common School Fund and, Together with the Oregon Public Employee Retirement Board, on Behalf of the Oregon Public Employee Re
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Ted Mortenson v. First American Corelogic Inc et al
as 8:2008cv00906
Plaintiff:
Ted Mortenson and Ted Mortenson
Defendant:
First American Corelogic Inc, George Livermore and DOES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401 Labor Management Disclosure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
