Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Hiser v. Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints et al
as 6:2021cv00280
Defendant:
Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and Successors and Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints
Plaintiff:
David Hiser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doe 1 et al v. Council et al
as 1:2020cv00497
Defendant:
Grand Teton Council, Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and Successors and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Doe 8, Mark Doe 1, Mark Doe 6 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson et al v. Doe et al
as 6:2020cv00190
Plaintiff:
John J Doe, John S Doe, Kristine Johnson and others
Defendant:
Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and Successors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Doe XX et al v. Boy Scouts of America et al
as 1:2017cv00184
Plaintiff:
John Doe XX , John Doe XXI , John Doe XXII and others
Defendant:
Boy Scouts of America , Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and Successors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Duff v. Christensen et al
as 3:2013cv01337
Defendant:
Miles J Christensen, Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and Successors and Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints
Plaintiff:
Scott Duff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Doe I et al v. Boy Scouts of America et al
as 1:2013cv00275
Plaintiff:
John Doe I , John Doe II , John Doe III and others
Defendant:
Boys Scouts of America, Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and Successors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Johnson v. Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints et al
as 3:2013cv00336
Defendant:
James H. Bean, Corporation Of The President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and Successors and John Does 1-3
Plaintiff:
Richard Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Doe v. Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, The et al
as 1:2009cv00351
Plaintiff:
Tom Doe, Tom Doe, Tom Doe and others
Defendant:
Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, The, Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, The, Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and Successors and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Doe v. Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints et al
as 2:2008cv00371
Plaintiff:
Tom Doe and Tom Doe
Defendant:
Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Doe 1 et al v. Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints et al
as 3:2007cv01499
Plaintiff:
Jack Doe 1, Jack Doe 2, Jack Doe 3 and others
Defendant:
Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
