Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Grandinetti v. Komori et al
as 1:2020cv00346
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America (CCA), Warden M. Frink, Warden J. Bradley and others
Plaintiff:
Francis Grandinetti
Interested Party:
Laurie Nadamoto and Shelley Harrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grandinetti v. Corrections Corporation of America (CCA) et al
as 1:2019cv00291
Defendant:
State of Hawaii, Department of Public Safety, Corrections Corporation of America (CCA), State of Arizona and others
Interested Party:
Laurie Nadamoto and Shelley Harrington
Plaintiff:
Francis Grandinetti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grandinetti v. Espinda et al
as 1:2018cv00208
Plaintiff:
Francis Anthony Grandinetti, II
Defendant:
Nolan P. Espinda, Department of Public Safety, Deputy Directors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tia v. Head of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit et al
as 1:2017cv00303
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
Head of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Thomas Doe, Canby Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grandinetti v. Jinbo et al
as 1:2016cv00674
Plaintiff:
Francis Grandinetti
Defendant:
Scott Jinbo, Howard Komori, Shari Kimoto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruh v. Hawaii, State of et al
as 1:2016cv00034
Plaintiff:
Richard M. Ruh
Defendant:
Hawaii, State of, Public Safety, Department of, Nolan Espinda and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Grandinetti v. Humane Restraint Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00456
Plaintiff:
Francis Grandinetti
Defendant:
Humane Restraint Company, Inc., National Contractor, Corrections Corporation of America (CCA) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Kimoto et al
as 1:2008cv00055
Plaintiff:
Vincent Lawrence Brown, Jr.
Defendant:
Shari Kimoto, Robert Parker, Darren Swenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
