Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Goodrick v. Idaho Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv00265
Plaintiff:
Dan Goodrick
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Corrections, Idaho Board of Correction, Debbie Field and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ullrich v. Otter et al
as 1:2017cv00026
Plaintiff:
Stephen Ullrich
Defendant:
Otter, Atencio, Director Idaho Board of Pardons and Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lovelace v. Sandy et al
as 1:2016cv00044
Plaintiff:
Faron E Lovelace
Defendant:
Robin Sandy, David McClusky, Howard Van Tassel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sauders v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2015cv00586
Plaintiff:
Charles Saunders
Defendant:
State of Idaho, Corizon Health Services, Correctional Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mansell v. Correctional Medical Services
as 1:2012cv00639
Plaintiff:
Alan Mansell
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mattocks v. Idaho Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv00382
Plaintiff:
Donald Keith Mattocks
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Corrections, Correctional Corporation of America Inc, Correctional Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hebdon v. Correctional Medical Services
as 1:2012cv00299
Plaintiff:
Melvin Hebdon
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hogan v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 1:2012cv00295
Plaintiff:
Todd Austin Hogan
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Alice Dawson, Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Correctional Medical Services
as 1:2011cv00590
Plaintiff:
Mark E Allen
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanson v. Smith et al
as 1:2011cv00525
Plaintiff:
Scott Richard Hanson
Defendant:
Johanna Smith, Scott David Lossman, April Charlene Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
