Cases 1 - 9 of 9
CUNNINGHAM v. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP
as 2:2020cv06192
Petitioner:
CRAIG CUNNINGHAM
Respondent:
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP
SZEMPLE v. RUTGERS UNIVERSITY et al

as 3:2019cv12746
Defendant:
WILLIE BONDS, REGISTER SCO SAUNDERS, BEVERLY HASTINGS
and others
Plaintiff:
CRAIG FRANCIS SZEMPLE
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
CUNNINGHAM v. CAPITAL ADVANCE SOLUTIONS, LLC et al

as 3:2017cv13050
Plaintiff:
CRAIG CUNNINGHAM
Defendant:
CAPITAL ADVANCE SOLUTIONS, LLC , GEOFFREY HORN , CHARLES BETTA
and others
Cause Of Action: (b)(3) Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991
ASHLEY v. PLEASANTVILLE CITY et al

as 1:2011cv07526
Defendant:
ANGELO MALDONADO, JAMES SEARLE, GRANT CUNNINGHAM, JR
and others
Plaintiff:
CRAIG ASHLEY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
PERALTA et al v. APEX. MORTGAGE CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv02829
Plaintiff:
ALBERT MURPHY , GUNESH MURPHY , KEVIN MURPHY
and others
Defendant:
DOES 1-40, WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., UNITED MIDWEST SAVINGS BANK
and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
WILSON v. LANIGAN et al

as 2:2014cv03746
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN, JAMES T. PLOUSIS, SAMUEL J. PLUMERI, JR.
and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WILSON
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
PERALTA et al v. ABN AMRO MORTGAGE GROUP, INC. et al

as 2:2013cv05607
Defendant:
GREENPOINT MORTGAGE FUNDING, INC. , FLAGSTAR BANCORP, INC. , 1ST MARINER BANK
and others
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL YEOMAN , KAREN WILLIAMS , KELVIN WILLIAMS
and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
BAADHIO v. HOFACKER et al

as 3:2015cv02752
Plaintiff:
RANDY BAADHIO
Defendant:
BRIAN HOFACKER, SEAN SULLIVAN, ROBERT PALMER
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
KATES v. CHRISTIE et al

as 2:2014cv05769
Plaintiff:
EDWARD KATES
Defendant:
CHRIS CHRISTIE, JOHN J. HOFFMAN, JAMES T. PLOUSIS
and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.