Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 41 - 50 of 7,394
KING et al v. ALLEN BRADLEY COMPANY et al
as 2:2013cv06106
Plaintiff: ROLAND KING and HELEN KING
Defendant: ALLEN BRADLEY COMPANY , ALLEN-SHERMAN-HOFF , ARVIN MERITOR and others
Cross_claimant: ALLEN BRADLEY COMPANY and MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING
Cross_defendant: ALLEN BRADLEY COMPANY , ALLEN-SHERMAN-HOFF , BECK/ARNLEY WORLDPARTS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ARENDT v. AW CHESTERTON COMPANY et al
as 2:2013cv60017
Plaintiff: GEORGIA ARENDT
Defendant: AW CHESTERTON COMPANY, ALBANY FELT COMPANY INC. , BRANDON DRYING FABRICS INC. and others
Thirdparty_defendant: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF WISCONSIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MORTIMER et al v. A.O. SMITH CORP. et al
as 2:2013cv04169
Plaintiff: LEROY J. MORTIMER and CHERYL MORTIMER
Defendant: A.O. SMITH CORP. , ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY , AMTICO and others
Cross_claimant: GENUINE PARTS CO. , NAPA , QUAKER CITY MOTOR PARTS and others
Cross_defendant: A.O. SMITH CORP. , ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY , AMTICO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
ROGERS v. 84 LUMBER COMPANY et al
as 2:2013cv04028
Plaintiff: DOUGLAS R. ROGERS
Defendant: 84 LUMBER COMPANY , AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, BORG-WARNER CORPORATION and others
Cross_claimant: GENUINE AUTO PARTS and METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO.
Cross_defendant: 84 LUMBER COMPANY, AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, BORG-WARNER CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
KILGORE et al v. ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY et al
as 2:2013cv04029
Plaintiff: VICTOR B. KILGORE and JEAN KILGORE
Defendant: ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY , ALLEN SHERMAN-HOFF, ALLIANCE LAUNDRY SYSTEMS LLC and others
Cross_claimant: BEAZER EAST , UNIVERSAL REFRACTORIES , METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO. and others
Cross_defendant: BEAZER EAST , ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY , ALLIANCE LAUNDRY SYSTEMS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
COSTA et al v. ALFA LAVAL, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv03800
Plaintiff: JOHN A. COSTA and CATHERINE COSTA
Defendant: ALFA LAVAL, INC., ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC. , AURORA COMPANY COMPANY and others
Cross_claimant: GENUINE PARTS COMPANY
Cross_defendant: ALFA LAVAL, INC., ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC. , AURORA COMPANY COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
STANFORD, JR. v. BUILDING SERVICES INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC. et al
as 2:2013cv60012
Plaintiff: HAROLD E. STANFORD, JR.
Defendant: BUILDING SERVICES INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC., CLEAVER BROOKS, INC., CRANE CO. and others
Thirdparty_defendant: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF WISCONSIN
Cross_claimant: SPRINKMANN SONS CORPORATION and WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
Cross_defendant: SPRINKMANN SONS CORPORATION , BUILDING SERVICES INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC., CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BLAKENEY et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 2:2013cv60005
Plaintiff: DONNA C. OGDEN BLAKENEY , ANTHONY OGDEN , ALAN R. OGDEN and others
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS, CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
DEVRIES et al v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2013cv00474
Plaintiff: JOHN B. DEVRIES and ROBERTA G. DEVRIES
Defendant: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY , CBS CORPORATION , ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY and others
Cross_claimant: MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING , BRAND INSULATION, INC. and CLEAVER BROOKS, INC.
Cross_defendant: MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING , ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY, ALLEN-SHERMAN-HOFF and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Asbestos Litigation
HEARN et al v. CRANE CO. et al
as 2:2013cv00298
Plaintiff: LEONARD B. HEARN and THERESA C. HEARN
Defendant: CRANE CO. , GENUINE AUTO PARTS, YARWAY CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?