Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
FRANCESE v. AMERICAN MODERN INSURANCE GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv02246
Defendant:
AMERICAN MORTGAGE INSURANCE GROUP, INC, SOUTHWEST BUSINESS CORPORATION, AMERICAN MORTGAGE INSURANCE GROUP, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
FRANCESE and LUIGI FRANCESE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Safe Credit Solutions, Inc. et al v. The Credit Pros International Corp.
as 2:2017cv04723
Plaintiff:
Safe Credit Solutions, Inc. and Ray Tejada
Defendant:
The Credit Pros International Corp.
Counter_claimant:
The Credit Pros International Corp.
Counter_defendant:
Safe Credit Solutions, Inc. and Ray Tejada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv03441
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02789
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv07986
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv06678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv05666
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Farina et al v. The Bank of New York et al
as 3:2015cv03395
Plaintiff:
Edith Farina and EMILIO FARINA
Defendant:
THE BANK OF NEW YORK, RESIDENTIAL CREDIT SOLUTIONS, INC., MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.