Cases 1 - 5 of 5
DMJ Associates, L.L.C. v. Capasso
as 16-3435
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant:
DMJ Associates, L.L.C., AKA DMJ Associates, L.L.C.
Def-Third-Party-Plaintiff-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
Exxon Mobil Corporation and Quanta Resource Corporation
Defendant-Counter-Claimant:
Clairol, Incorporated, Basf Corporation, Powell Duffryn Terminals, Inc. and others
Third-Party-Plaintiff:
Paribas North America
Third-Party-Defendant:
EQ Northeast, Inc., AKA Franklin Environmental Services, Inc., FKA Franklin Pumping Service, Coastal Oil New York, Inc, Alcan Aluminum Corporation, AKA Alcan Sheet & Plate and others
Defendant:
Carl A. Capasso, Darling International, Inc., Russell W. Mahler and others
Breen et al v. A. L. Eastmond & Sons, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv06261
Plaintiff:
John F. Breen and Milvi Breen
Defendant:
A. L. Eastmond & Sons, Inc. , A.O. Smith Corporation , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sewak v. Arvinmeritor, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00590
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Sewak
Defendant:
Arvinmeritor, Inc., Asbestos Corporation Ltd. , Bird, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
RSCC Wire & Cable L.L.C.
Cross_defendant:
RSCC Wire & Cable L.L.C., Arvinmeritor, Inc., Asbestos Corporation Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Resch v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 1:2013cv08977
Plaintiff:
John Resch
Defendant:
84 Lumber Company, A.O. Smith Corporation, Asbestos Corporation Ltd. and others
Cross_claimant:
Union Carbide Corporation
Cross_defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation, 84 Lumber Company, A.O. Smith Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Keating v. Asbestos Corporation Limited et al
as 1:2013cv04105
Plaintiff:
Marie Keating
Defendant:
Asbestos Corporation Limited, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Armstrong International Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
