Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Kathryn Campbell v. American International Group, et al
as 13-7041
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kathryn Lynn Campbell, On behalf of herself and similarly situated Equity Units holders of American International Group, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
American International Group, R. H. Benmosche, Chairman, President, CEO, W. D. Cornwell and others
M. et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2012cv01704
Plaintiff:
RHONDA MOORE , B. M. , HELEN JONES and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
STEWART et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2012cv01654
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Plaintiff:
SHAVON STEWART , A. D. , GEROLEAN CURETON and others
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
WASHINGTON et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2012cv01544
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , ANTHONY DAY and SHALANA MCCOMMONS
Plaintiff:
SHEILA WASHINGTON , M. W. , CHANTAL MADDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
CAMPBELL v. AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. (AIG) et al
as 1:2012cv00115
Plaintiff:
KATHRYN LYNN CAMPBELL
Defendant:
AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. (AIG), R. H. BENMOSCHE, W. D. CORNWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
FLYNN, et al v. D&M TILE CORPORATION
as 1:2008cv01428
Plaintiff:
H. J. BRAMLETT, ROBERT HOOVER, GREGORY R. HESS and others
Defendant:
D&M TILE CORPORATION and D&M TILE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MORTON et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HOUSING AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2008cv01022
Plaintiff:
LADESHA MORTON, D. G., L. G. and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HOUSING AUTHORITY, MICHAEL KELLY and LORRY BONDS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
