Cases 41 - 50 of 85
Walker v. Stevens et al
as 2:2015cv01383
Defendant:
Bouakka, Greg Cox, D. W. Neven and others
Plaintiff:
Robert T. Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. State of Nevada ex rel et al
as 2:2015cv01124
Defendant:
James G. Cox, Jerry Howell, NDOC and others
Plaintiff:
Miguel Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stoltz v. Neven et al
as 2:2015cv00511
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and D. W. Neven
Petitioner:
Robert Stoltz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Neven et al
as 3:2015cv00071
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and D. W. Neven
Petitioner:
Kenneth Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sterling Beatty v. D. Nevens, et al
as 14-16788
Petitioner - Appellant:
STERLING P. BEATTY
Respondent - Appellee:
D. W. NEVENS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Osipo v. Neven et al
as 2:2014cv01418
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Nevada and D. W. Neven
Petitioner:
Frederick R. Osipo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kevari v. Neven et al
as 2:2014cv01143
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and D. W. Neven
Petitioner:
Scott Allen Kevari
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carl Edwards v. James Cox, et al
as 14-16301
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARL D. EDWARDS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES COX, D. W. NEVEN, FARRIS, Caseworker and others
Jose Gallimort v. D. Neven, et al
as 14-71790
Petitioner:
JOSE GALLIMORT
Respondent:
D. W. NEVEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
CiBulka v. Neven et al
as 2:2014cv00644
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada, Warden D. W. Neven and Tonopah Conservation Camp
Petitioner:
James P. CiBulka
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
