Cases 1 - 8 of 8
UMOJA ERECTORS, LLC v. D.A. NOLT, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv05046
Plaintiff:
UMOJA ERECTORS, LLC
Defendant:
NORTH AMERICAN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and D.A. NOLT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
D.A. NOLT, INC. v. THE PHILADELPHIA MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2018cv04997
Plaintiff:
D.A. NOLT, INC.
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE PHILADELPHIA MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
D.A. NOLT, INC. v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
as 2:2017cv03865
Plaintiff:
D.A. NOLT, INC.
Defendant:
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
D.A. NOLT, INC. v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv01451
Plaintiff:
D.A. NOLT, INC.
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE PHILADELPHIA MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Luzerne County v. D.A. Nolt, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00831
Plaintiff:
Luzerne County
Defendant:
D.A. Nolt, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
D.A. NOLT, INC. v. LOCAL UNION NO. 30 UNITED UNION ROOFERS, WATERPROOFERS AND ALLIED WORKERS et al
as 2:2012cv05810
Plaintiff:
D.A. NOLT, INC.
Defendant:
LOCAL UNION NO. 30 UNITED UNION ROOFERS, WATERPROOFERS AND ALLIED WORKERS , ROOFERS LOCAL NO. 30 COMBINED HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND , ROOFERS LOCAL NO. 30 COMBINED PENSION FUND and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
ROOFERS LOCAL NO. 30 COMBINED PENSION FUND et al v. D.A. NOLT, INC.
as 2:2009cv01445
Plaintiff:
ROOFERS LOCAL NO. 30 COMBINED PENSION FUND, BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ROOFERS LOCAL NO. 30 COMBINED PENSION FUND and MICHAEL O'MALLEY
Defendant:
D.A. NOLT, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
D.A. NOLT, INC. v. KING FORGE CONSTRUCTION, LLC et al
as 2:2008cv00955
Plaintiff:
D.A. NOLT, INC.
Defendant:
KING FORGE CONSTRUCTION, LLC, FRED ANDREWS, HYPERION BANK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
