Cases 1 - 10 of 32
INZA et al v. AT&T INC. et al
as 1:2024cv03054
Defendant:
SRIKANT M. DATAR, LUIS A. UBINAS, SRINIVASAN GOPALAN and others
Plaintiff:
VOIP-PAL.COM, INC, RICHARD INZA and MICHAEL INZA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
VOIP-PAL.COM, INC v. AT&T INC. et al
as 1:2024cv03051
Defendant:
AT&T SERVICES, INC., ANDRE ALMEIDA, TIMOTHEUS HOTTGES and others
Plaintiff:
VOIP-PAL.COM, INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
LEON et al v. AT&T INC. et al
as 1:2024cv02397
Plaintiff:
RICHARD INZA, MICHAEL INZA and RAY LEON
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. KENNARD, JOHN STANKEY, SRINIVASAN GOPALAN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
VOIP-PAL.COM, INC v. AT&T INC. et al
as 1:2024cv02395
Defendant:
AT&T SERVICES, INC., RAPHAEL KUBLER, AT&T CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
VOIP-PAL.COM, INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
TURNER v. VESTBERG et al
as 2:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
JANIS TURNER
Defendant:
HANS VESTBERG, MATTHEW ELLIS, CLARENCE OTIS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
TURNER v. VESTBERG et al
as 3:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
JANIS TURNER
Defendant:
HANS VESTBERG, MATTHEW ELLIS, CLARENCE OTIS, JR. and others
Not Yet Classified:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
GABEL v. VESTBERG et al
as 3:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
GERRY GABEL
Defendant:
HANS VESTBERG, MATTHEW ELLIS, CLARENCE OTIS, JR. and others
SARVER v. VESTBERG et al
as 3:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
WADE SARVER
Defendant:
HANS VESTBERG, MATTHEW ELLIS, CLARENCE OTIS, JR. and others
MOORE v. VESTBERG et al
as 3:2023cv23071
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY MOORE
Defendant:
HANS VESTBERG, MATTHEW ELLIS, CLARENCE OTIS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
JANKOWSKI v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al
as 3:2023cv21123
Plaintiff:
ANDREW JANKOWSKI
Defendant:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC., HANS VESTBERG, MATTHEW ELLIS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
