Cases 1 - 10 of 211
Emma Maryann Margare Lovett v. Darrell Adams
as 19-55033
Petitioner / Appellant:
EMMA MARYANN MARGARE LOVETT
Respondent / Appellee:
DARRELL G. ADAMS, Warden
Jose Cervantes v. Darrel Adams, et al
as 12-16196
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE H. CERVANTES
Defendant - Appellee:
DARREL G. ADAMS, Warden, CSP, SUSAN HUBBART, Director of Sacramento, J. GARZA, Lt. IGI, KVSP and others
Edward Portillo v. Darrell Adams, et al
as 11-56943
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWARD PORTILLO
Respondent - Appellee:
DARRELL G. ADAMS, Warden and SUSAN HUBBARD, Director of Adult California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation
Eric Smith v. Darrell Adam
as 11-72822
Petitioner:
ERIC LAMAR SMITH
Respondent:
DERRAL G. ADAMS, Warden and DARRELL G. ADAMS, Warden
Bernard White v. Darrell Adams, et al
as 10-56097
Petitioner - Appellant:
BERNARD ANDREW WHITE
Respondent - Appellee:
DARRELL G. ADAMS, Warden and UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
Bernard White v. Darrell Adam
as 10-56088
Petitioner - Appellant:
BERNARD ANDREW WHITE
Respondent - Appellee:
DARRELL G. ADAMS, Warden
Bennie Dixon v. Darrell Adams, et al
as 10-55959
Petitioner - Appellant:
BENNIE DIXON
Respondent - Appellee:
DARRELL G. ADAMS, Warden, Warden and EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., The Attorney General of the State of California
Edward Portillo v. Darrell Adams, et al
as 10-55925
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWARD PORTILLO
Respondent - Appellee:
DARRELL G. ADAMS, Warden, Warden and SUSAN HUBBARD, Director of Adult California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation
Clifford Smith v. Darrell Adams, et al
as 10-55517
Petitioner - Appellant:
CLIFFORD D. SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
DARRELL G. ADAMS, Warden and BILL LOCKYER, Attorney General
Robert Winters v. Susan Hubbard, et al
as 10-15667
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT ANTHONY WINTERS
Defendant - Appellee:
SUSAN HUBBARD, Director of CDCR, DARRELL G. ADAMS, Warden, Warden, L. WATSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
