Cases 1 - 10 of 10
BAILEY v. EBBERT et al
as 1:2015cv02072
Petitioner:
ARI BAILEY
Respondent:
DAVID EBBERT and RONALD C. MACHEN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MOWATT v. EBBERT
as 1:2014cv00112
Petitioner:
KOBI L. MOWATT
Respondent:
DAVID EBBERT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00884
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MEYERS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2010cv00608
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, INTERNAL AFFAIRS, OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL OF FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLE v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2010cv00549
Plaintiff:
JAMES COLE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, DAVID ATWOOD, N.E. REGIONAL DIRECTOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GONZALES v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2010cv00277
Petitioner:
ANGEL GONZALES
Respondent:
BARACK OBAMA, HARLEY LAPPIN, D. SCOTT DODRILL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LOUIS v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2009cv01952
Petitioner:
LUCNER ST. LOUIS
Respondent:
BARACK OBAMA, HARLEY LAPPIN, JOE NORWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MCDONALD v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2009cv01897
Petitioner:
DAVID JOVON MCDONALD
Respondent:
BARACK OBAMA, HARLEY LAPPIN, D. SCOTT DODRILL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
STANKO v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2009cv01757
Petitioner:
RUDOLPH STANKO
Respondent:
BARACK OBAMA, HARLEY LAPPIN, D. SCOTT DODRILL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MCCALL v. EBBERT et al
as 1:2009cv01435
Petitioner:
BONDARY MCCALL
Respondent:
DAVID EBBERT, TIMOTHY OUTLAW, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
