Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Garza v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2023cv01066
Plaintiff:
David Garza
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
GARZA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv17508
Plaintiff:
DAVID GARZA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GARZA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv01891
Plaintiff:
DAVID GARZA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jeweltex Manufacturing Inc. Retirement Plan v. Kansas City Southern et al
as 1:2021cv10149
Plaintiff:
Jeweltex Manufacturing Inc. Retirement Plan
Defendant:
Kansas City Southern, Lydia I. Beebe, Lu M. Cordova and others
HOPKINS v. KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN et al
as 2:2021cv03528
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HOPKINS
Defendant:
KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN, LYDIA I BEEBE, LU M CORDOVA and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Rosenfeld Family Foundation v. Kansas City Southern et al
as 1:2021cv06670
Plaintiff:
Rosenfeld Family Foundation
Defendant:
Kansas City Southern, Lydia I. Beebe, Lu M. Cordova and others
Coffman v. Kansas City Southern et al
as 1:2021cv01145
Plaintiff:
Catherine Coffman
Defendant:
Kansas City Southern, Lydia I. Beebe, Lu M. Cordova and others
Jeweltex Manufacturing Inc. Retirement Plan v. Kansas City Southern et al
as 1:2021cv06633
Plaintiff:
Jeweltex Manufacturing Inc. Retirement Plan
Defendant:
Kansas City Southern, Lydia I. Beebe, Lu M. Cordova and others
Ghiveci v. Kansas City Southern et al
as 1:2021cv06590
Plaintiff:
Denisa Ghiveci
Defendant:
Kansas City Southern, Lydia I. Beebe, Lu M. Cordova and others
Finger v. Kansas City Southern et al
as 1:2021cv01127
Plaintiff:
Susan Finger
Defendant:
Kansas City Southern, Lydia I. Beebe, Lu M. Cordova and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
