Cases 1 - 10 of 87
U L Coleman Co Ltd v. Bey
as 5:2023cv00837
Plaintiff:
U L Coleman Co Ltd doing business as Tallow Wood Apartments
Counter Claimant:
Arsenio Damar Bey
Counter Defendant:
Ray Cole, U L Coleman, III, David Lester and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Grohoske v. Lopez
as 22-51103
Petitioner / Appellant:
David Lester Grohoske
Respondent / Appellee:
Sheriff Joe Lopez
Grohoske v. Lopez
as 6:2022cv01133
Petitioner:
David Lester Grohoske
Respondent:
Director TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin and Sheriff Joe Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grohoske v. Lopez
as 6:2022cv01131
Petitioner:
David Lester Grohoske
Respondent:
TDCJ Director Bobby Lumpkin, Sheriff Joe Lopez and Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grohoske et al v. STATE OF TEXAS et al
as 6:2022cv00818
Plaintiff:
David Lester Grohoske, Roy Lester Grohoske and Diann Hazlewood Grohoske
Defendant:
STATE OF TEXAS, Sheriff Joe Lopez, Medical Examiner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grohoske v. Lopez
as 22-50450
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Lester Grohoske
Defendant / Appellee:
Sherriff Joe Lopez, Falls County DA Kathryn J. Gilliam, Christy Wideman and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00907
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Denial of Application for Naturalization Hearing
Grohoske et al v. Lopez et al
as 6:2022cv00418
Plaintiff:
David Lester Grohoske, Roy Lester Grohoske and Diann Hazlewood Grohoske
Defendant:
Sheriff Joe Lopez, Falls County DA Kathryn J. Gilliam, Christy Wideman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00790
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
