Cases 1 - 10 of 20
HINES v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv04858
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Petitioner:
DICKEY HINES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PHILLIPS v. LOVE et al
as 2:2020cv01273
Defendant:
EDWARD E. LOVE and NEW PRIME, INC.
Plaintiff:
DICKEY PHILLIPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DICKEY v. PFIZER, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv00851
Plaintiff:
SANDRA DICKEY
Defendant:
PFIZER, INC. and PFIZER INTERNATIONAL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DICKEY v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
as 2:2014cv00508
Plaintiff:
JOYCELYN DICKEY
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DICKEY et al v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
as 2:2013cv06141
Plaintiff:
CINDY DICKEY and RONALD J. DICKEY
Defendant:
AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARROLL et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2013cv05840
Plaintiff:
GEORGE IRA CARROLL , DAMOS CARTER , CHARLES RAY CARTER, SR. and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MELTON et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv07138
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE MELTON , MARGARET FOX , WALLACE DICKEY and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, RIDDELL, INC., ALL AMERICAN SPORTS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ANDERSON et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv03124
Plaintiff:
JAMAL ANDERSON , KARSTEN BAILEY , CHRISTIE BAILEY and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL PROPERTIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DICKEY v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv41854
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E. DICKEY
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
DICKEY v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv53854
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD D. DICKEY
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
