Cases 11 - 20 of 248
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60274
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00975
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in Habeas Corpus: INS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv62412
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv62310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Simonaj v. Garland et al
as 1:2023cv10322
Defendant:
Attorney General Merrick Brian Garland, Secretary, USDHS ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Acting Director Patrick J. Lechleitner and others
Plaintiff:
Armando Simonaj
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Patrick Lechleitner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 hb Removal - Petition of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv24434
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Xiao v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2023cv09954
Plaintiff:
Mengning Xiao
Defendant:
Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Director UR MENDOZA JADDOU, Field Office Directo SUSAN QUINTANA and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Immigration: Review of Denial of Naturalization Application
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
